Contact Us Toll Free at  1-866-476-9103 hlenett@bn-lawyers.com
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background

Based in Austin, Texas, Barron & Newburger, P.C. has a national presence in advising and defending the credit and collection industry. With branch offices in California, Colorado, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, the firm employs attorneys licensed in ten states and over 30 federal districts. The firm’s clients include banks, debt buyers, law firms, and collection agencies, and the firm has acted as defense counsel and served as amicus curiae counsel in cases of national impact, such as Heintz v. Jenkins, 514 U.S. 291, 115 S.Ct. 1489, 131 L.Ed.2d 395 (1995), Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50, 125 S. Ct. 460,160 L.Ed.2d 389 (2004), Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 559 US 573, 130 S. Ct. 1605, 176 L.Ed.2d 519 (2010); White v. Goodman, 200 F.3d 1016 (7th Cir. 2000), and Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet, Inc., 184 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1999).

Striving to provide unique, personal, and proven solutions to real-world problems, the firm is known for delivering cost-effective and efficient representation in litigation, regulatory and compliance affairs, business transactions and reorganization and insolvency proceedings.

 

Blog and Firm News

 

BNPC Attorneys Explain Merchant Cash Advances

Barbara Barron and Stephen Sather co-authored Why MCA?  Adding Havoc to Chaos in Vol. 33, Issue No. 3 (July/Aug./Sept. 2019)…

read more

Texas Super Lawyers Recognizes Three Barron Newburger Attorneys

Manuel Newburger, Barbara Barron and Stephen Sather were each named to the 2019 edition of Texas Super Lawyers, a Thomson…

read more

Robert Shannon Joins Barron & Newburger, P.C.

Robert “RJ” Shannon, a talented bankruptcy counsel has joined Barron & Newburger as an attorney in its Austin Office. RJ…

read more

Supreme Court Rules that an Ambiguous Agreement Cannot Be a Basis to Compel Class Arbitration

In Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. Animal Feeds Int’l Corp., the Supreme Court held in 2010 that a court may not…

read more