What’s In A Name?

On November 1, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals declined to elevate form over substance, affirming a ruling from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissing a consumer’s FDCPA claim that a law firm’s collection letter failed to identify accurately the name of the creditor to whom the debt was…

Read More

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Its View of Materiality

A false statement by a debt collector must be “material” to be actionable under the FDCPA.  This principle has been recognized by the United States Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits.  On August 18, the Ninth Circuit clarified its interpretation of materiality. In Afewerki v. Anaya Law…

Read More

Bona Fide Error Defense Requires Reasonable, but not Foolproof, Policies and Procedures

New Jersey’s federal district court has provided a measure of comfort under circumstances that will be familiar to most debt collectors.   In Gebhardt v. LJ Ross Assocs., the plaintiff’s attorney sent the defendant a certified letter stating that the plaintiff had retained counsel, and that all communications should be directed to counsel. (The letter also…

Read More