Contact Us Toll Free at  1-866-476-9103 hlenett@bn-lawyers.com
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background
Slide background

Based in Austin, Texas, Barron & Newburger, P.C. has a national presence in advising and defending the credit and collection industry. With branch offices in California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, the firm employs attorneys licensed in ten states and over 30 federal districts. The firm’s clients include banks, debt buyers, law firms, and collection agencies, and the firm has acted as defense counsel and served as amicus curiae counsel in cases of national impact, such as Heintz v. Jenkins, 514 U.S. 291, 115 S.Ct. 1489, 131 L.Ed.2d 395 (1995), Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50, 125 S. Ct. 460,160 L.Ed.2d 389 (2004), Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 559 US 573, 130 S. Ct. 1605, 176 L.Ed.2d 519 (2010); White v. Goodman, 200 F.3d 1016 (7th Cir. 2000), and Riviere v. Banner Chevrolet, Inc., 184 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1999).

Striving to provide unique, personal, and proven solutions to real-world problems, the firm is known for delivering cost-effective and efficient representation in litigation, regulatory and compliance affairs, business transactions and reorganization and insolvency proceedings.

News

 

Supreme Court Provides Harsh Lesson on the Importance of a Writing

Bankruptcy is intended to allow an honest but unfortunate debtor to obtain a fresh start.  In order to keep dishonest…

read more

Plaintiff Who Denied Knowledge of a Debt Could Not Meet Burden of Proving Consumer Status

A decision by a U.S. Magistrate Judge in Wisconsin may provide an interesting defense for debt collectors who are sued…

read more

Second Circuit Holds that Letter Need Not Reference Nonexistent Interest

The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its decision in Taylor v. Fin. Recovery Services, Inc., affirming that…

read more

Sixth Circuit Dismisses FDCPA Claims for Lack of Article III Standing

Holding that “Congress cannot override [the] baseline requirement of Article III of the U.S. Constitution by labeling the violation of…

read more